German Regulators Label Deepseek AI 'Illegal', Demand Ban Over China Data
Deepseek's German ban highlights a deepening global conflict over AI data privacy, state surveillance, and tech giant responsibility.
June 27, 2025

In a significant move that highlights the escalating tensions between Western data privacy regulations and the global expansion of Chinese technology firms, the popular artificial intelligence application Deepseek is facing a potential ban from German app stores. The Berlin Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information has formally reported the app to both Apple and Google, labeling it as "illegal content" due to the transfer of personal data to China without the necessary legal safeguards as mandated by European Union law. This action places the onus on the two American tech giants to review the complaint and decide whether to block German users from downloading the application, a decision that could have wide-ranging implications for the burgeoning AI industry and international data governance.
The core of the issue, as articulated by Berlin's Data Protection Commissioner, Meike Kamp, is Deepseek's failure to provide convincing evidence that the personal data of German users is afforded the same level of protection in China as it is within the European Union.[1][2] Under the EU's stringent General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the transfer of personal data outside the bloc is tightly controlled and requires robust legal mechanisms to ensure its security.[3] Deepseek's privacy policy explicitly states that it stores a variety of user data, including search queries, uploaded files, and chat histories, on servers located in China.[2][3] Commissioner Kamp has emphasized the "far-reaching access rights" of Chinese authorities to personal data held by companies within their jurisdiction, a situation that leaves EU citizens with no effective legal recourse if their data is mishandled.[2][4] This fundamental conflict between the EU's privacy-by-design principles and China's state surveillance capabilities is at the heart of the German regulator's complaint.
The formal notification to Apple and Google was not a sudden development but rather the culmination of a series of escalating actions by German data protection authorities. In May, the Berlin agency had already issued a warning to Deepseek, urging the company to either comply with EU data transfer standards or voluntarily withdraw its app from German marketplaces.[2][4] Deepseek's failure to comply with this request prompted the commissioner to invoke the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA), a newer piece of legislation that places direct responsibility on platform providers like Apple and Google to remove illegal content.[3][5] Furthermore, this move by the Berlin authority is part of a broader, coordinated investigation by several German state data protection authorities that began in February.[6][7] That initial probe focused on Deepseek's non-compliance with Article 27 of the GDPR, which requires companies without a physical presence in the EU to appoint a local representative—a requirement Deepseek had failed to meet.[6][7]
Germany is not the first European nation to take a hard stance against the Chinese AI firm. Italy had already blocked Deepseek from its app stores earlier in the year, citing similar concerns over a lack of transparency in how the company processes personal data.[3][8] The Netherlands has also taken precautionary measures by banning the use of the app on government devices.[8] The scrutiny extends beyond Europe, with South Korea's data protection authority launching an investigation that found Deepseek was transferring user inputs and device information to servers in China owned by ByteDance, the parent company of TikTok, without obtaining user consent.[9] These international actions paint a picture of growing global distrust regarding the data handling practices of the rapidly ascending AI company. Adding another layer of concern are allegations from cybersecurity researchers who discovered code on Deepseek's website that could potentially relay user data to China Mobile, a state-owned telecommunications firm with alleged ties to the Chinese military.[10][11] Citing a senior U.S. official, reports have also surfaced alleging that Deepseek is actively supporting China's military and intelligence services, further intensifying national security concerns.[2]
The standoff between German regulators and Deepseek serves as a critical case study for the entire artificial intelligence sector. It underscores the significant legal and reputational risks that AI companies face when operating across jurisdictions with disparate data privacy laws. For companies like Apple and Google, it presents a complex challenge as they must navigate their roles as platform gatekeepers, balancing user access to innovative technologies against their obligations to remove content deemed illegal by sovereign states. The outcome of this case will likely set a precedent for how other non-EU AI applications are treated within the bloc, potentially forcing a choice between adapting to stringent European standards or forgoing access to a lucrative market. As AI models become increasingly integrated into daily life, the battle over data, privacy, and state influence, as exemplified by the Deepseek case, will continue to shape the future of the global technology landscape.
Research Queries Used
Deepseek German app stores data protection
Berlin Commissioner for Data Protection Deepseek
Deepseek GDPR violation Germany
Deepseek data transfer to China
Apple Google response to illegal content report Deepseek