AI's Growing Energy Bill: ChatGPT Query Rivals 2009 Google Search.
A single ChatGPT query consumes as much energy as a 2009 Google search, raising alarms about AI's growing environmental footprint.
June 11, 2025

A recent assertion by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, stating that an average ChatGPT query consumes approximately 0.34 watt-hours of electricity, has brought renewed attention to the energy footprint of artificial intelligence.[1][2][3][4][5] This figure, when contextualized, suggests a single interaction with the popular AI chatbot uses roughly the same amount of energy as a Google search did back in 2009.[6][7] The comparison highlights the significant energy demands of current large language models and raises important questions about the sustainability and future scaling of AI technologies.
The 0.34 watt-hour figure per ChatGPT query was mentioned by Altman in a blog post discussing the resource demands of AI models.[1][2] He contextualized this by comparing it to the energy an oven might use in just over a second, or what a high-efficiency lightbulb would consume in a couple of minutes.[1][2][4] While OpenAI has not detailed the precise methodology behind this calculation, the disclosure provides a benchmark for understanding the operational energy costs of such sophisticated AI.[1][4] It's important to note that this figure is for a single query, or "inference," and does not include the massive energy expenditure required for training these complex models, which can run into gigawatt-hours.[8][9][10][11] For instance, training GPT-3 reportedly consumed 1,287 megawatt-hours of electricity.[12][9][10] However, with the widespread adoption of AI tools like ChatGPT, which reportedly handles billions of queries, the cumulative energy consumed during the inference phase has become a predominant concern.[6][13][14] Some analyses indicate that inference can account for 60-70% of an AI model's total energy consumption.[13][14]
The comparison point, a 2009 Google search, reportedly used about 0.3 watt-hours (or 0.0003 kWh) of electricity.[6][15][7][16][17][18][19] This figure was released by Google itself in a blog post aiming to correct then-current, much higher estimates of its search energy footprint.[7][16] At the time, Google stated this was equivalent to the energy the average adult's body burns in about ten seconds.[7] This makes the energy consumption of a contemporary ChatGPT query roughly equivalent to that of a Google search from over a decade and a half ago. It is crucial to acknowledge that Google's search technology and data center efficiency have significantly improved since 2009.[15][16][20][21] Current estimates for a Google search are much lower, with some suggesting figures around 0.04 Wh or even 0.00004 kWh, reflecting advancements in hardware efficiency, data center Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE), and algorithmic optimization.[15][16] Google has publicly stated its data centers are considerably more efficient than typical ones and that its latest AI processors show significant efficiency gains.[22][21] Therefore, while a single ChatGPT query might rival a 2009 Google search in energy use, it likely consumes substantially more energy – possibly around ten times more – than a Google search conducted today.[15][12][17][23][10][24][11]
The implications of AI's energy consumption are far-reaching for the industry and the planet. The rapid growth in AI adoption is leading to a dramatic increase in electricity demand from data centers.[25][26][27][28][29] Projections from the International Energy Agency (IEA) suggest that electricity demand from data centers worldwide could more than double by 2030, with AI being the most significant driver of this increase.[25][29] In some regions, like the United States, data centers are projected to account for a substantial portion of growth in electricity demand.[25][28] This surge raises concerns about increased greenhouse gas emissions, especially if the electricity is sourced from fossil fuels.[12][28][29] The sheer scale of operations means even small energy savings per query can lead to substantial overall reductions. The AI industry is actively exploring solutions, including the development of more power-efficient hardware like specialized AI chips and new architectures, creating smaller, more optimized models, and smarter model training techniques.[27][30][31][32] Furthermore, there's a push towards powering data centers with renewable energy sources and improving cooling efficiencies, as water consumption for cooling data centers is another significant environmental consideration.[12][9][23]
As artificial intelligence becomes more deeply integrated into various aspects of daily life and industry, from composing emails to complex scientific research, its energy appetite will continue to be a critical area of focus.[33][27][34] The comparison of a ChatGPT query's energy use to that of an older Google search serves as a stark reminder of the computational intensity of modern AI. While the benefits and potential of AI are immense, the industry faces the significant challenge of balancing innovation with environmental responsibility and energy sustainability.[12][14][30][35] Efforts to enhance AI energy efficiency are not just about cost savings but are crucial for ensuring the long-term viability and societal acceptance of these powerful technologies.[31][32] The conversation around AI's energy footprint underscores the need for ongoing research, transparent reporting, and a commitment to developing greener AI solutions.[33][27]
Research Queries Used
Sam Altman ChatGPT energy consumption 0.34 watt-hours
energy consumption of a Google search in 2009
average energy consumption per Google search current
ChatGPT energy consumption vs Google search
AI model energy consumption trends
environmental impact of large language models
data center energy consumption AI
energy efficiency in AI development
OpenAI energy consumption details
Google search energy efficiency improvements since 2009
Sources
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]