Uncontrolled AI Costs Choke Enterprise Innovation and ROI
Despite being innovation drivers, escalating cloud, SaaS, and AI costs are cannibalizing budgets and hindering strategic IT investments.
September 10, 2025

Enterprises are increasingly embracing on-demand technologies like public cloud, Software-as-a-Service (SaaS), and generative AI as fundamental drivers of innovation, agility, and competitive advantage. A recent study highlights that nearly eight out of ten organizations view these technologies as critical to their growth strategies.[1] However, a significant paradox has emerged: while essential for progress, the escalating and often unpredictable costs associated with these services are threatening to erode the very value they create. This financial strain is forcing a reckoning within corporate IT departments and boardrooms, as leaders grapple with budget overruns and the challenge of achieving a sustainable return on investment in a rapidly advancing technological landscape.
The core of the issue lies in a widespread failure to contain spending on these consumption-based models. According to a global study from the Capgemini Research Institute, which surveyed 1,000 executives from large corporations, a staggering 76% of organizations exceeded their public cloud budgets by an average of 10%.[2] The problem is even more pronounced with emerging technologies, as 68% overspent on generative AI and 52% surpassed their SaaS budgets.[2] These overruns are not minor miscalculations but significant financial strains driven by a combination of factors, including inflation, surging demand for digital infrastructure, and the resource-intensive nature of AI adoption.[2] More than eight in ten executives report significant cost increases across cloud, SaaS, and Gen AI, creating a challenging environment where the tools meant to foster efficiency are becoming sources of financial unpredictability.[2]
The burgeoning field of artificial intelligence is a primary catalyst for this spending surge. As companies rush to harness the power of AI, they are discovering the substantial underlying infrastructure costs. AI-related services, along with cloud storage and analytics, are among the top contributors to rising cloud expenses.[3][4] The computational resources required for training and deploying AI models are immense, leading to fluctuating and hard-to-predict demands that can wreck carefully planned budgets.[5] This has created a knock-on effect, with over two-thirds of businesses admitting that rising cloud costs are forcing them to reduce spending in other critical IT areas.[3] Consequently, budgets for new AI initiatives, cybersecurity, and even IT staffing are being trimmed to offset the ballooning expense of cloud services, with some organizations describing their cloud computing costs as "unmanageable."[6] This creates a difficult cycle where the investment in foundational technology like the cloud begins to cannibalize the budget for the very innovations it is meant to support.
The implications of this uncontrolled spending extend beyond budgetary concerns, touching on governance, security, and the actual realization of expected benefits. A major contributing factor is the rise of "shadow IT," where business units procure technology independently.[2] This decentralized purchasing, which now drives 59% of generative AI and 48% of SaaS spending, leads to underutilized resources, inefficiencies, and significant security vulnerabilities, with nearly all executives admitting to bypassing formal IT procurement processes.[2] Furthermore, the promised returns on these substantial investments are proving elusive for many. The Capgemini report revealed that only 29% of organizations achieved their expected cost savings from SaaS, and just 38% realized the anticipated speed of innovation with generative AI.[2] This disconnect between spending and value is compounded by a lack of mature cost management strategies. While many companies are adopting FinOps—a framework for managing cloud costs—its implementation is often narrow and operational, rather than strategic. A mere 2% of organizations with FinOps teams cover cloud, SaaS, and Gen AI holistically, limiting their ability to make informed, value-driven business decisions.[2][7]
In response to this growing crisis of cost, enterprises are being urged to adopt a more strategic and disciplined approach to their on-demand technology usage. The path forward involves moving beyond simple adoption to strategic optimization, which requires a fundamental shift in mindset and operations. Experts recommend developing a "cloud-smart" strategy that aligns technology spending with specific business outcomes and fosters a shared understanding of value across finance, technology, and business departments.[7] This includes engineering scalable and cost-aware architectures from the outset and expanding the scope of FinOps to provide a holistic view of all on-demand services.[7] Without a clear strategy to monitor, manage, and align these powerful technologies with tangible business goals, companies risk having their investments in growth and innovation be consumed by the very tools they are counting on for future success.